Comments for Semai

Comment on FAQ: Why do rdfs:domain and :range work backwards? by Dave

Dave — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:32:09 +0000

Thanks Jos. Quite agree. The original text was in the context of the Jena OWL full reasoners for which the optional extensional RDFS semantic rules are enabled. That should have been made clear in the posting.

Comment on FAQ: Why do rdfs:domain and :range work backwards? by Jos de Bruijn

Jos de Bruijn — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:26:05 +0000

Be advised that under normative RDFS entailment,
eg:personalName rdfs:domain eg:Animal .
will *not* be entailed. However, all resources in the domain of eg:personalName will be of rdf:type eg:Animal. Thus, the domain constraint holds in practice, but the statement asserting the constraint does not, because of the intensional nature of normative RDFS entailment.

Comment on OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies by William Vambenepe — OWL news you can use

William Vambenepe — OWL news you can use — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:27:16 +0000

[...] Reynolds’ overview of OWL2, with a focus on vocabularies and [...]

Comment on OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies by Tweets that mention Semai » Blog Archive » OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies -- Topsy.com

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:03:01 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Leigh Dodds, Bob DuCharme and twitt_bot, William Vambenepe. William Vambenepe said: RT: @bobdc: Nice intro to basic ideas of OWL 2 from Dave Reynolds: http://bit.ly/FQr0q [...]

Comment on OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies by admin

admin — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:04:14 +0000

Hi Kendall,

Thanks for the pointers, interesting work.

Dave

Comment on OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies by Bob DuCharme (bobdc) 's status on Monday, 26-Oct-09 13:43:01 UTC - Identi.ca

Bob DuCharme (bobdc) 's status on Monday, 26-Oct-09 13:43:01 UTC - Identi.ca — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:43:26 +0000

[...] http://www.amberdown.net/2009/10/owl2-for-rdf-vocabs/ a few seconds ago from web [...]

Comment on OWL 2 for RDF vocabularies by Kendall Clark

Kendall Clark — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:55:00 +0000

Hi Dave,

Very cool post. We’ve been working on extending Pellet with closed world reasoning semantics for OWL in order to do what you’re describing: using OWL as a constraint language for RDF (and other) data. We’ve released a prototype and have a series of blog posts describing the work:

http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/category/semweb/owl/pellet/integrity-constraints/